Department of Communication

Assessment Plan

April 2004

 

Student Outcomes

 

·         All undergraduate majors will demonstrate knowledge of fundamental communication terms and concepts.

·         All undergraduate majors will demonstrate an understanding of major traditions of communication theory: e.g., socio-psychological; cybernetics; rhetorical; semiotic, socio-cultural, critical, and phenomenological.

·         All undergraduate majors will demonstrate basic communication skills relative to writing for designated audiences, detecting argumentation in public speeches and other messages, evaluating the quality of information sources in media, and adjusting messages using traditional or digital media.

 

 

Mission Statement

The mission of the Department of Communication at the University of Toledo is to educate students on a broad spectrum of human communication ranging from interpersonal to mass communication.  Faculty believe that competencies in the study of communication and the development of critical thinking, contextual competence, professional identity, values and ethics are based upon the liberal learning of the humanities, natural sciences, and social sciences. Responsible, articulate communication remains primary in both the learning process and in any professional endeavor that follows.  Educated citizens must understand and practice effective communication to ensure full and responsible participation in society.  Recognizing the central role of communication in education and human affairs, faculty members provide the University and the community a broad range of teaching, research, and service activities that help people achieve their full potential.

 

 

Educational Objectives

 

  1. To acquire knowledge of fundamental communication terms and concepts, all undergraduate majors will take and pass the following courses with a ‘C’ or higher:  COMM 2000 (Mass Communication and Society), COMM 2400 (Information Analysis and Synthesis), COMM 2600 (Public Presentations), COMM 3870 (Communication Theory), COMM 4910 (Portfolio Project) (graded Pass/Fail).
  2. To demonstrate grasp of communication practices relative to writing, arguing, evaluating, and interpretation, all undergraduate majors will take 8-16 hours in Conceptual (theory) communication courses and 8-16 hours of Applied (technique) communication courses in the 43 hours allotted for their major.

 

  1. To demonstrate understanding of the major traditions in communication theory, all undergraduate majors will pass examinations, writing, and performance projects that assess the following set of four core objectives.  These are called “core objectives” because they derive directly from the substantive “core” courses mentioned above that all communication majors must pass to graduate.  Because communication is regarded as a field where many lines of thought and practice converge, rather than a narrowly focused discipline, knowledge of the core objectives may be demonstrated in ways that are sufficiently broad to accommodate the several concentrations of our majors (public relations, journalism, broadcasting and general communication). These four core objectives are:

·         Presentation is the ability to appropriately explain or package a concept or message directed to a specified audience and/or situation.  Presentation is among the most basic and essential communication skills, and originates in the classical study of rhetoric. Presentation manifests, and can therefore be measured, in a variety of communication formats suitable to the concentrations of communication majors, e.g., speeches, proposals, video productions, press releases, press packages, radio broadcasts, newsletters, speeches and similar targeted communications common to private and public sector endeavor.

·         Theory, Ethics & History is knowledge and conversance with general laws, values, principles of inherited wisdom and empirical research in the field of communication. The body of communication history, ethics, and laws affect all individuals, groups, organizations and society, e.g. communication effects, interpersonal and group communication principles, the role of media in society and politics, media values and systems, etc.  

·         Information Analysis / Critical Thinking concerns knowledge and ability to evaluate sources and processes of information-manufacture in the modern world, including the ability to produce and defend new knowledge according to the conventions and standards demanded by modern, scientific open societies, e.g., research methods and design, logical argumentation, strengths/limitations of methods, data sources, etc.

·         Applied Knowledge is knowledge and ability to apply the range of communication concepts/skills to solve current social/organizational problems.

 

The department will concretely measure these core objectives with a 0-4 point Communication Knowledge Scale based on the Stone-Wiske model for knowledge representations. The measures will be applied to student works submitted for the required senior portfolio class. It is the student who will designate which specific works are to be used for assessment on each of the four objectives; the student will also be responsible for collecting, maintaining and presenting these works as part of the senior portfolio class as described in Appendix D—Statement of Student Responsibilities.

 

Types of Assessment

  • Student learning outcomes will be assessed primarily through evaluation of a senior portfolio.  The portfolio is comprised of papers and/or electronic work representing all four of the core objectives of the Communication curriculum. It will be the student’s responsibility to bring examples of their work (see Educational Objectives) to the portfolio class (Communication 4910).  It is also the student’s responsibility to designate which work is being submitted for the respective objectives.  Occasionally, we recognize that theoretically-based work such as communication campaign proposals may simultaneously demonstrate accomplishment in more than one of the core objectives.

·         All majors will demonstrate their knowledge of communication concepts and skills in a Senior Portfolio Project using a measurement instrument based on the Stone-Wiske criteria for the representation of knowledge (Mansilla, 1998; see Appendix A)

  • The student is required to submit a copy of the graduation audit to the portfolio class.
  • Using the Student Portfolio Evaluation Rubric (see Appendix B) the Portfolio instructor will evaluate the student’s work.  The Communication Knowledge Scale that underlies the rubric is described in detail in Appendix A.
  • The Student Portfolio instructor who has evaluated the work will also compare the assessment scores on each of the four objectives with the student’s GPA, both overall and in the communication major. These data will be regularly entered in a data set used for assessment purposes, and will allow for targeted adjustments, if required, in pedagogy and curriculum.
  • The Department of Communication will provide portfolio examples on the Department’s website to help students prepare their portfolios.
  • When students declare Communication as a major, the Departmental Advisor will provide them with a copy of the “Statement of Student Responsibilities” (Appendix D.) The students will read and then sign two copies, one kept by the student, the other by the Department of Communication.
  • At the beginning of each semester, the Department of Communication will hold a meeting for all students enrolled in the Senior Portfolio class.  At this meeting, students will be reminded of their responsibilities to provide examples of their work.
  • All graduating seniors will complete an exit questionnaire (see Appendix E).
  • The Department of Communication will survey graduates of our program once every five years.

 

 

Timeline for Assessment

 

Spring 2004                 Once the departmental assessment plan has been approved, the

                                    assessment committee will begin distributing  the new guidelines

                                    to majors and faculty. 

Students will be asked to sign the Statement of Student Responsibilities (Appendix D).

 

                                    The Department of Communication will complete a preliminary

                                    analysis of student exit questionnaires.

 

Fall 2004                     All students declaring Communication as a major will be given the

                                    new guidelines and the Statement of Student Responsibilities.  This

                                    will take place at a general meeting early each semester.

The Department will submit to Arts and Sciences Council the change to “C” or better for the Core classes in Communication.  Portfolio instructors will begin using the new guidelines in the Senior        Portfolio class (Comm 4910). 

Portfolio instructors will begin using a new exit questionnaire for graduating seniors. 

Portfolio instructors will begin evaluating Senior Portfolios using the Communication Knowledge Scale and the Portfolio Evaluation Rubric.

Examples of high quality Senior Portfolios will be placed on the Departmental website.

                                    Beginning in Fall 2004 and for every semester thereafter

the Departmental Assessment Committee will evaluate exit questionnaires and Senior Portfolio rubrics from the

                                    previous semester.

                                    These results will be entered into a departmental data base.

 

Spring 2006                 The Department of Communication will survey a random sample

of its graduates.  Results should be compiled by the forthcoming fall semester.

 

The Department realizes that the full effect of this assessment plan will not be realized until these curricular changes have been in place for a full four years.  Nevertheless, a body of potentially useful data will accrue in the meantime. Department Assessment committee members believe that as students grow accustomed to their responsibilities in this process, the Senior Portfolio class will become extremely valuable.

 

 

Specific Program/Curricular Changes

 

            Student Portfolios: At the beginning of each semester, the Assessment Committee will analyze the results of the preceding semester’s Senior Portfolio rubrics.  In addition, the Committee will examine any specific comments made by the Senior Portfolio instructors.  The Committee will issue a report summarizing its findings.  The report will be distributed to all departmental faculty.  The Chair will send a final copy to the Dean of Arts and Sciences.  If specific areas of concerns are identified, the department will address those in a meeting dedicated to the topic. Portfolio results may also identify specific pedagogical issues, the department will address those at a meeting dedicated to the topic.

 

            Exit Questionnaires:  At the beginning of each semester, the Assessment Committee will examine the Senior Exit Questionnaires.  The Committee will prepare a report that will be distributed to departmental faculty.  If the report determines there are difficulties with either the curriculum or specific pedogological styles, the department will address those issues at a departmental meeting.

 

            Graduate Survey:  Beginning in spring, 2006, and occurring every five years thereafter, the Department of Communication will conduct a random survey of its graduates.  The survey will have several goals.  First, it will determine what types of jobs our students have, and have had, at various points in their post-collegiate careers.  Second, it will determine what parts of our curriculum they believe most benefited them.  Finally, it should help determine if there are elements missing from our curriculum.

 

 

Changes to Planning and Reallocation

 

Assessment data from exit interviews, the Senior Portfolio class and the graduate survey is intended to aid the department in strategic planning, allocation of resources, and—importantly—highlight specific strengths and weaknesses in the curriculum.  Comparing scores on the educational objectives to student’s overall and major GPAs will allow us to identify possible areas of concern. The graduate survey, additionally, will help adjust curriculum and pedagogy to meet new demands.

 

Assessment Liaisons:

 

            Richard Knecht, Chair, Department of Communication

            David E. Tucker, Chair, Department Assessment Committee

            Paul Fritz and Brian Patrick, members, Assessment Committee

 

 

Appendix A

Communication Knowledge Scale – Based on Stone-Wiske

Representations of Knowledge Scale

 

Ranking

Description

Master = 4.0

Corresponds to ordinal level of “excellent” in demonstrated knowledge/ability in the core objective. 

Fluent, in-depth knowledge of theory, practices, techniques, contexts, formats and conventions related to core objective.

Thoroughly grounded in disciplinary knowledge related to core objective and can relate knowledge to other disciplines
Can construct/critique knowledge and/or understand processes of knowledge construction
Ability to interpret and act on the world

Can explain or demonstrate knowledge in creative way

Can combine disciplines for performances/demonstrations of   knowledge.

Excellent, powerful expression, grammar, syntax, composition abilities

 

Apprentice = 3.0

Corresponds to ordinal level of “good” in demonstrated knowledge/ability in the core objective.

Good Grounding in disciplinary knowledge
Can explore opportunities and consequences of knowledge
Understands knowledge construction a complex process initiated by others in field.

Good expression, grammar, syntax, composition abilities

Adequate knowledge of theory, practices, techniques, contexts, formats and conventions related to core objective.

Novice = 2.0

Corresponds to ordinal level of “fair” in demonstrated knowledge /ability in the core objective.

Knowledge limited to rituals of testing and school
Rehearsed connection between and among ideas

Understands knowledge only as a step-by- step process.

Validity of knowledge depends on external authority, e.g., “I’ll make more money with a college education.”

Fair expression, grammar, syntax, composition abilities

Fair, but quite limited knowledge of theory, practices, techniques, contexts, formats and conventions related to core objective.

Naïve = 1.0

Corresponds to ordinal level of “poor” in demonstrated knowledge/ability in the core objective.

Little or no connection between the classroom and the real world

Little or no consideration of the purposes or uses of knowledge, e.g., ‘I don’t have a clue.’

Poor grammar, syntax, expression, composition abilities

Poor knowledge of theory, practices, techniques, contexts, formats and conventions related to core objective.

Nothing = 0.0

Corresponds to ordinal level of “failing” in demonstrated knowledge/ability in the core objective

Incoherent or irrelevant work, or absence of any apparent meaningful knowledge relating to core objective.

Lack of demonstrated knowledge of theory, practices, techniques, contexts, formats and conventions related to core objective.

 

 

Appendix B

Student Portfolio Evaluation Rubric

 

Student Name:                                                              I.D.:

 

 

Core Objective

 

Description of Portfolio Submission

 

 

Score *

 

1. Presentation

Includes theory, practices, techniques, contexts, formats and conventions related to ability/knowledge to package and present information in writing, speech, broadcast or electronic media., e.g., organization., delivery, audience suitability, message design, use of evidence, etc.

 

 

 

2. Theory / Ethics / History

Includes theory, practices, techniques, contexts, formats and conventions related to ability/knowledge of communication-relevant theory, history, ethics, and laws that affect individuals, groups, organizations and society, e.g. communication effects, interpersonal and group communication principles, media law, roles and political-social functions of media, etc.

 

 

3.Information Analysis / Critical Thinking

Includes theory, practices, techniques, contexts, formats and conventions related to ability/knowledge in sources and processes of information, and knowledge-manufacture in the modern world, e.g., research methods and design, logical argumentation, strengths/limitations of methods, critical book reviews, critical essays, etc. 

 

 

4. Applied Knowledge

Includes demonstrated ability to apply theory, practices, techniques, contexts, formats and conventions related to above objectives to the solution or understanding of a real-world problem at the micro, group, organizational, or macro-social level, e.g., business, or social service delivery proposals; communication audits, case studies, analyses, consulting projects, etc.

 

 

 

            Average of the four core objective scores above:       ________________________

 

 

                                    Student Overall GPA:                                    ________________________

 

 

                                    Student GPA in Major:                       ________________________

Comments:

 

* 0 = None, 1 = Naïve, 2 = Novice, 3 = Apprentice, 4 = Master. See Appendix A for detailed description of scale.

 

 

Appendix C

Assignment Samples

 

Presentation Objective

Theory, Ethics, History Objective

Information Analysis / Critical Thinking Objective

Applied Knowledge Objective

Some acceptable examples of student portfolio work include:

Resume/Cover letter for actual position

Video-taped speech

Video-taped/recorded broadcast authored by student

Commercials, advertisements, other production made by student

Sales Presentation

Documentary film or radio broadcast

Newsletter

Press Packets

Video news feeds

News or Feature writing articles

Website

Some acceptable examples of student portfolio work include:

Critical essays

Essays from exams/tests

Comparative essays

Book reviews

Policy reviews and White Papers

Theory/Literature reviews

Workplace values

Media law legal brief

Communication and gender

Trends and predictions

Some acceptable examples of student portfolio work include:

Research proposals
 
Measuring media content

Determining media effects 

Surveying audiences

Defining issues

Fallacies in arguments

Limitations/strengths of research methods

Heuristics

Interview technique

Case studies

Research findings

Problem-solving report for COMM 2400

Some acceptable examples of student portfolio work include:

Solving current problem in industry, media or an organization.

How to organize/design web sites

Network contacts – how to avoid mistakes

Anticipating and describing customers’
values in trade publications.

Lessons from in-depth
interview from industry “player”

Nascent problem in industry
 
Internships and communication factors

Communication/ public relations campaign
    

 

 

Appendix D

Statement of Student Responsibilities

Communication 4910—Senior Portfolio

Department of Communication

University of Toledo

 

 

All students majoring in Communication at the University of Toledo are required to pass Communication 4910—Senior Portfolio—in order to graduate.  This class imposes special responsibilities on the student.  This document describes (1) the purpose of the class (2) design of the class, and (3) the special responsibilities of the student.  At the time a student declares communication as a major, the student must sign the attached Statement of Responsibilities for Senior Portfolio.

 

Purpose of Senior Portfolio  

Senior Portfolio has two purposes:

·         Demonstration of professional and academic ability. Under faculty supervision, the student compiles a professional portfolio of the student’s work that will assist in gaining professional employment or graduate training. The portfolio acts as a capstone on the student’s undergraduate education.

 

·         Assessment of Student Learning and Skills.  The works contained in the portfolio allows the faculty to assess student learning along the department’s core educational objectives.  The student must demonstrate acceptable strengths in these educational objectives to pass the Senior Portfolio course.  These four core objectives are:

 

1.       Presentation is the ability to appropriately explain or package a concept or message directed to a specified audience and/or situation.  Presentation is among the most basic and essential communication skills, and originates in the classical study of rhetoric. Presentation manifests, and can therefore be measured, in a variety of communications formats suitable to the concentrations of communication majors, e.g., speeches, proposals, video productions, press releases, press packages, radio broadcasts, newsletters, speeches and similar targeted communications common to private and public sector endeavor.

2.       Theory, Ethics & History is knowledge and conversance with general laws, values, principles of inherited wisdom and empirical research in the field of communication. The body of communication history, ethics, and laws affect all individuals, groups, organizations and society, e.g. communication effects, interpersonal and group communication principles, the role of media in society and politics, media values and systems, etc.  

3.       Information Analysis / Critical Thinking concerns knowledge and ability to evaluate sources and processes of information-manufacture in the modern world, including the ability to produce and defend new knowledge according to the conventions and standards demanded by modern, scientific open societies, e.g., research methods and design, logical argumentation, strengths/limitations of methods, data sources, etc.

4.       Applied Knowledge is knowledge and ability to apply the range of communication concepts/skills to solve current social/organizational problems.  

 

Design of Senior Portfolio

·         The student reads and signs this statement of responsibilities at the time when the communication major is declared. The Communication Department advisor will keep a copy of the form and the student also receives a copy.  It is now the responsibility of the student to select and maintain documents for use in the portfolio. These documents should be selected to represent the learning objectives above.  In addition to a cover letter and a resume, the portfolio contains work performed by the student in at least five communication courses.  Such work would include papers, research proposals, video productions, tests and other written or recorded work by the student that demonstrates ability and potential.

 

·         In the senior year, the student registers for Senior Portfolio and after conferring with the faculty member teaching the class, compiles the portfolio itself.  The student cannot pass the class without the required documents.

 

·         The faculty member teaching the Portfolio class assesses the student along the learning objectives using the attached criteria worksheet. 

 

 

Special Responsibilities of the Student 

·         There is no way for the student to pass the Portfolio class if the student does not keep and present papers and other work to demonstrate ability in the four objective areas described above.  The student is required to create, select and maintain all documents for the Portfolio.  This responsibility begins when Communication is declared as a major and continues throughout the Portfolio class to its end.

·         The student is required also to write a cover memorandum that will accompany the Portfolio.  This memorandum will specify which of the works in the portfolio the student wishes to be considered for use in assessing each of the particular educational objectives.   

 

 

I have read and understand the descriptions and conditions above concerning my responsibilities for Senior Portfolio, Communication 4910, and I agree to these conditions.

 

 

 

 

 

________________________________                                ________________ 

Student Signature                                                        Date

 

 

________________________________                                _________________

Advisor Signature                                                        Date

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix E

Exit Questionnaire

 

Bibliography

 

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and

            development.  San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

 

Kolb link: http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/kolb.html

 

Mansilla, V. B. (1998).  What are the qualities of understanding? In M.S. Wiske (Ed.),

            Teaching for understanding:  Linking research with practice (pp. 161-198).

            San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.